VeriWaspplain-English test authoring tool
VeriWasp vs testRigor
testRigor is the closest in concept to VeriWasp: both let you avoid traditional test code. testRigor uses a plain-English command syntax you write out step by step. VeriWasp is lighter still. You describe the flow in your own words (or record it), and an AI works out which elements to act on, runs it in a real browser, and judges the result. It is aimed squarely at indie founders and small teams.
| testRigor | VeriWasp | |
|---|---|---|
| Authoring | Write tests in a plain-English command syntax. | Describe the flow in plain English, or record it once. No code. |
| Element handling | Refer to elements in English commands. | AI finds the right element each run, so a markup change rarely breaks a test. |
| Where it runs | Hosted test execution. | Fully hosted. Runs on demand, on a schedule, or on every deploy. |
| Pass / fail | Commands and assertions you author. | AI judges each step against a real browser and writes a plain-English report. |
| Best fit | Teams wanting English-based test suites at scale. | Indie founders and small teams who want their critical flows covered without owning a test suite. |
When testRigor is the better choice
You want to build and manage a large suite of English-syntax tests with fine control over each command, often at team or enterprise scale.
When VeriWasp is the better choice
You want the lightest possible path to covered critical flows: describe what the user does, and let the AI handle the steps, the run, and the verdict.
Questions, answered
Both use plain English. What's different?
testRigor has you write out tests in a plain-English command syntax. VeriWasp has you describe the flow, and the AI infers the steps and elements, runs it, and judges it, which is less to author and maintain.
Is VeriWasp built for large teams?
VeriWasp is designed for indie founders and small teams who want their critical paths covered simply. testRigor leans more toward larger suites and organizations.
Can VeriWasp handle a full signup or checkout flow?
Yes. Those critical multi-step flows are exactly what it is built for, judged in a real browser.
Do I maintain test steps over time?
Rarely. Because an AI resolves elements each run, a markup change usually does not break the flow the way a scripted step would.
See it on your own site
Describe your signup, login, or checkout in a sentence. VeriWasp runs it in a real browser and shows you exactly what breaks, before your users do.
Start free, no card